From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Add new error_action COPY ON_ERROR "log" |
Date: | 2024-03-13 02:38:42 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACW=QJcmqP4VWNAzBmgaG5f5bSjU_hAGzS2NfwRJdy2cJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 5:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 12:54:29PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > +1. But, do you want to add them now or later as a separate
> > patch/discussion altogether?
>
> The attached 0003 is what I had in mind:
> - Simplification of the LOG generated with quotes applied around the
> column name, don't see much need to add the relation name, either, for
> consistency and because the knowledge is known in the query.
> - A few more tests.
> - Some doc changes.
LGMT. So, I've merged those changes into 0001 and 0002.
> >> Wouldn't it be better to squash the patches together, by the way?
> >
> > I guess not. They are two different things IMV.
>
> Well, 0001 is sitting doing nothing because the COPY code does not
> make use of it internally.
Yes. That's why I left a note in the commit message that a future
commit will use it.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v7-0001-Add-LOG_VERBOSITY-option-to-COPY-command.patch | application/x-patch | 9.5 KB |
v7-0002-Add-detailed-info-when-COPY-skips-soft-errors.patch | application/x-patch | 5.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2024-03-13 02:56:21 | Re: Infinite loop in XLogPageRead() on standby |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-03-13 02:22:59 | Re: Improve eviction algorithm in ReorderBuffer |