Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error
Date: 2021-05-01 05:12:58
Message-ID: CALj2ACW+A8XN+Yfcf-7JxCDfNSt+necCNvepEgKxd0ZFhRPTMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:49 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Looking into this again, why not as shown below? IMHO, this way the
> code will be logically the same as it was before the patch, basically
> why to process an extra statement ( *volatility_item = defel;) if we
> have already decided to error.

I changed my mind given the concerns raised on removing the goto
statements. We could just do as below:

diff --git a/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
b/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
index 9548287217..1f1c74c379 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ compute_common_attribute(ParseState *pstate,
duplicate_error:
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
- errmsg("conflicting or redundant options"),
+ errmsg("option \"%s\" specified more than once", defel->defname),
parser_errposition(pstate, defel->location)));
return false; /* keep compiler quiet */

I'm not attaching above one line change as a patch, maybe Vignesh can
merge this into the main patch.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-05-01 05:17:25 Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-05-01 05:12:45 Re: Log enhancement for aclcheck permissions failures