From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: binary version of pg_current_wal_insert_lsn and pg_walfile_name functions |
Date: | 2022-09-20 11:43:17 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACVvU-keOOyag6KjJygtHebkgh8bYhOGmM3TyTSoOaOopQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:19 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Currently, we have pg_current_wal_insert_lsn and pg_walfile_name sql
> functions which gives us information about the next wal insert
> location and the WAL file that the next wal insert location belongs
> to. Can we have a binary version of these sql functions?
+1 for the idea in general.
As said, pg_waldump seems to be the right candidate. I think we want
the lsn of the last WAL record and its info and the WAL file name
given an input data directory or just the pg_wal directory or any
directory where WAL files are located. For instance, one can use this
on an archive location containing archived WAL files or on a node
where pg_receivewal is receiving WAL files. Am I missing any other
use-cases?
pg_waldump currently can't understand compressed and partial files. I
think that we need to fix this as well.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-09-20 11:43:49 | Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?) |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2022-09-20 11:37:13 | Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format |