From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats |
Date: | 2022-12-19 12:35:38 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACVubu7JAsJJeUi5irivMb+YvUDSrYvEyHfLHR_6P15z1Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:14 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> In the first place I don't like that we count the same things twice.
> Couldn't we count the number only by any one of them?
>
> If we remove CheckPointerStats.ckpt_bufs_written, CreateCheckPoint can
> get the final number as the difference between the start-end values of
> *the shared stats*. As long as a checkpoint runs on a single process,
> trace info in BufferSync will work fine. Assuming single process
> checkpointing there must be no problem to do that. (Anyway the current
> shared stats update for checkpointer is assuming single-process).
What if someone resets checkpointer shared stats with
pg_stat_reset_shared()? In such a case, the checkpoint complete
message will not have the stats, no?
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ted Yu | 2022-12-19 12:44:15 | Re: On login trigger: take three |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-12-19 12:21:19 | Re: Add LSN along with offset to error messages reported for WAL file read/write/validate header failures |