From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Use pgstat_progress_update_multi_param instead of single param update |
Date: | 2021-02-21 11:13:23 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACVsyRxQnAJYaf=Z-AbRUAeYa6W8e4TQ3_POEnHUWeuS4g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 4:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:30:21AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Attached is a patch that replaces some subsequent multiple
> > update_param calls with a single update_multi_param.
>
> Looks mostly fine to me.
>
> - if (OidIsValid(indexOid))
> - pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND,
> - PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND_CLUSTER);
> - else
> - pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND,
> - PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND_VACUUM_FULL);
> + pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND,
> + OidIsValid(indexOid) ? PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND_CLUSTER :
> + PROGRESS_CLUSTER_COMMAND_VACUUM_FULL);
> What's the point of changing this one?
While we are at it, I wanted to use a single line statement instead of
if else, just like we do it in do_analyze_rel as below.
pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_ANALYZE_PHASE,
inh ?
PROGRESS_ANALYZE_PHASE_ACQUIRE_SAMPLE_ROWS_INH :
PROGRESS_ANALYZE_PHASE_ACQUIRE_SAMPLE_ROWS);
We can ignore it if it doesn't seem a good way.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-02-21 12:03:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-02-21 10:47:54 | Re: Use pgstat_progress_update_multi_param instead of single param update |