Re: Fix a comment in basic_archive about NO_INSTALLCHECK

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix a comment in basic_archive about NO_INSTALLCHECK
Date: 2023-12-18 05:58:46
Message-ID: CALj2ACVR2tes=E=kWGvZerPm6Y4BHw9nQWCfLFx1cxPkPK-zhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:26 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 08:56:10AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > It looks like comments in make file and meson file about not running
> > basic_archive tests in NO_INSTALLCHECK mode are wrong. The comments say the
> > module needs to be loaded via shared_preload_libraries=basic_archive, but
> > it actually doesn't. The custom file needs archive related parameters and
> > wal_level=replica. Here's a patch correcting that comment.
>
> Saying that, updating the comments about the dependency with
> archive_library and the module's GUC is right.

Reworded the comment a bit and attached the v2 patch.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Fix-a-comment-in-basic_archive-about-NO_INSTALLCH.patch application/octet-stream 1.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-12-18 06:39:02 Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2023-12-18 05:49:23 Re: Transaction timeout