From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
Date: | 2022-01-14 13:22:45 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACVM4wjS+wiNZf4ssdNMhSR-XUhR99fYbV=pC9_-=5wCtw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:50 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks. IMO, the following format of logging is better, so attaching
> the v2-0001-Add-checkpoint-and-redo-LSN-to-LogCheckpointEnd-l.patch as
> .patch
>
> 2021-12-28 02:52:24.464 UTC [2394396] LOG: checkpoint completed at
> location=0/212FFC8 with REDO start location=0/212FF90: wrote 451
> buffers (2.8%); 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 1 recycled;
> write=0.012 s, sync=0.032 s, total=0.071 s; sync files=6,
> longest=0.022 s, average=0.006 s; distance=6272 kB, estimate=6272 kB
One of the test cases was failing with the above style of the log
message, changing "checkpoint complete" to "checkpoint completed at
location" doesn't seem to be a better idea. It looks like the users or
the log monitoring tools might be using the same text "checkpoint
complete", therefore I don't want to break that. Here's the v3 patch
that I think will work better. Please review.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Add-checkpoint-and-redo-LSN-to-LogCheckpointEnd-l.patch | application/x-patch | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-01-14 13:32:35 | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
Previous Message | tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-01-14 13:18:49 | RE: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |