Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com, melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie
Subject: Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns
Date: 2023-03-10 01:20:05
Message-ID: CALj2ACVJGqJpoxpXQnKv_5sN7wSV5OPWYA5Lq7KkcOvE=utxBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 6:43 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> I'd really like to do something about the errors we raise in the
> module when specifying LSNs in the future for this release, now. I
> got annoyed by it again this morning while doing \watch queries that
> kept failing randomly while stressing this patch.

Perhaps what is proposed here
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACWqJ+m0HoQj9qkAV2uQfq97yk5jN2MOdfKcXusXsyptKQ@mail.gmail.com
might help and avoid many errors around input LSN validations. Let's
discuss that in that thread.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-03-10 01:21:55 Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-03-10 01:13:14 Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken