On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 4:59 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> So I would finish with the attached, close enough to what Quan has
> sent upthread.
Thanks. The patch looks good to me, except a minor comment - isn't it
"int2 for these fields" as the fields still exist? + /* pageinspect >=
1.10 uses int4 instead of int2 for those fields */
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.