From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Retry Cached Remote Connections for postgres_fdw in case remote backend gets killed/goes away |
Date: | 2020-10-01 12:14:23 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACV1UWTMDPNUcGOH1on-RJ7ARPx4G0pDyxQAhVSxdfZamw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:32 PM Fujii Masao
<masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > And another way, if we don't want to use wait_pid() is to have a
> > plpgsql stored procedure, that in a loop keeps on checking for the
> > backed pid from pg_stat_activity, exit when pid is 0. and then proceed
> > to issue the next foreign table query. Thoughts?
>
> +1 for this approach! We can use plpgsql or DO command.
>
Used plpgsql procedure as we have to use the procedure 2 times.
>
> >
> > mypid = -1;
> > while (mypid != 0)
> > SELECT pid INTO mypid FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type =
> > 'client backend' AND application_name = 'fdw_retry_check';
>
> Or we can just wait for the number of processes with
> appname='fdw_retry_check' to be zero rather than checking the pid.
>
Done.
Attaching v7 patch with above changes. Please review it.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v7-Retry-Cached-Remote-Connections-For-postgres_fdw.patch | application/x-patch | 10.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | k.jamison@fujitsu.com | 2020-10-01 12:55:34 | RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2020-10-01 12:09:28 | small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions |