| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages |
| Date: | 2022-07-20 04:32:22 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACV0ux_AeCV-xJkA6rbmsdN8KTHGOCx8vJCAa=DEtmgqaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 6:55 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:58:28 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:43:59PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > > Done. PSA v5 patch set.
> >
> > LGTM. I've marked this as ready-for-committer.
>
> I find the following sentense in config.sgml. "Specifies the minimum
> size of past log file segments kept in the pg_wal directory"
>
> postgresql.conf.sample contains "logfile segment" in a few lines.
Done. PSA v6 patch set.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v6-0001-Use-WAL-segment-instead-of-log-segment.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.0 KB |
| v6-0002-Consistently-use-WAL-file-s-in-docs.patch | application/octet-stream | 18.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2022-07-20 04:43:03 | Re: Remove fls(), use pg_bitutils.h facilities instead? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-07-20 04:20:46 | Remove fls(), use pg_bitutils.h facilities instead? |