From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available |
Date: | 2022-09-19 14:19:21 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACUg_MpcOwHZQm-9M3ScyLK-NLy9=yBhU9TfTfC0U3w1YQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 4:58 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:06 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > In other words, it seems to me that the macro name doesn't manifest
> > the condition correctly.
> >
> > I don't think we don't particularly want to do that unconditionally.
> > I wanted just to get rid of the macro from the usage site. Even if
> > the same condition is used elsewhere, I see it better to write out the
> > condition directly there..
>
> I wanted to avoid a bit of duplicate code there. How about naming that
> macro IsXLOGSourceSwitchToStreamEnabled() or
> SwitchFromArchiveToStreamEnabled() or just SwitchFromArchiveToStream()
> or any other better name?
SwitchFromArchiveToStreamEnabled() seemed better at this point. I'm
attaching the v7 patch with that change. Please review it further.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v7-0001-Allow-standby-to-switch-WAL-source-from-archive-t.patch | application/x-patch | 17.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2022-09-19 14:39:11 | Re: confirmed_flush_lsn shows LSN of the data that has not yet been received by the logical subscriber. |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2022-09-19 14:10:17 | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |