Re: Can there ever be out of sequence WAL files?

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can there ever be out of sequence WAL files?
Date: 2022-01-12 01:49:48
Message-ID: CALj2ACURO8hgKB68H1wHvm0snnxWu7mQh1z+7Q_FpqFpajc7-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 7:45 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can the postgres server ever have/generate out of sequence WAL files?
> For instance, 000000010000020C000000A2, 000000010000020C000000A3,
> 000000010000020C000000A5 and so on, missing 000000010000020C000000A4.
> Manual/Accidental deletion of the WAL files can happes, but are there
> any other extreme situations (like recycling, removing old WAL files
> etc.) caused by the postgres server leading to missing WAL files?
>
> What happens when postgres server finds missing WAL file during
> crash/standby recovery?
>
> Thoughts?

Hi Hackers, a gentle ping for the above question. I think I sent it
earlier during the holiday season.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-01-12 01:56:35 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-01-12 01:18:05 Re: [Ext:] Re: Stream Replication not working