Re: Avoid memory leaks during base backups

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Avoid memory leaks during base backups
Date: 2022-10-20 10:46:58
Message-ID: CALj2ACUJVSLtVoHcjrgpZVH0H0+pPZYx1OJ717gXVXkrpvr6Ww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 9:23 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:10 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > One option is to just have do_pg_start_backup() blow
> > away any old memory context before it allocates any new memory, and
> > forget about releasing anything in PostgresMain(). That means memory
> > could remain allocated after a failure until you next retry the
> > operation, but I don't think that really matters. It's not a lot of
> > memory; we just don't want it to accumulate across many repetitions.
>
> This seems reasonable to me.

I tried implementing this, please see the attached v7 patch.
Currently, memory allocated in the new memory context is around 4KB
[1]. In the extreme and rarest of the rare cases where somebody
executes select pg_backup_start(repeat('foo', 1024)); or a failure
occurs before reaching pg_backup_stop() on all of the sessions
(max_connections) at once, the maximum/peak memory bloat/leak is
around max_connections*4KB, which will still be way less than the
total amount of RAM. Hence, I think this approach seems very
reasonable and non-invasive yet can solve the memory leak problem.
Thoughts?

[1]
(gdb) p *backupcontext
$4 = {type = T_AllocSetContext, isReset = false, allowInCritSection =
false, mem_allocated = 4232,
methods = 0x55c925b81f90 <mcxt_methods+240>, parent =
0x55c92766d2a0, firstchild = 0x0, prevchild = 0x0,
nextchild = 0x55c92773f1f0, name = 0x55c9258be05c "on-line backup
context", ident = 0x0, reset_cbs = 0x0}

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Avoid-memory-leaks-during-backups-using-SQL-calla.patch application/x-patch 2.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-10-20 11:09:14 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-10-20 09:57:14 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)