Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function?

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function?
Date: 2021-10-25 10:00:46
Message-ID: CALj2ACUEOQTe75a0EF1ruKfuEQkK0RVD2YZBF8rNghaGytKdrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:28 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 10/21/21, 6:51 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's v3 for further review.
>
> I've marked this as ready-for-committer. The only other feedback I
> would offer is nitpicking at the test code to clean it up a little
> bit, but I don't think it is necessary to block on that.

I forgot to change the CATALOG_VERSION_NO (it can be set to right
value while committing the patch), I did it in the v4 attached here,
otherwise the patch remains same as v3.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-change-privileges-of-pg_backend_memory_contexts-a.patch application/octet-stream 7.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-25 10:49:08 Re: pg_receivewal starting position
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-10-25 09:39:01 Re: Added schema level support for publication.