From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API |
Date: | 2022-05-17 11:49:19 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACU+9qnHVq82v6CjG+LD5yTc=gnXxFc2SJ=uPJFtSA3=0Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:11 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This adds additional variants of palloc, pg_malloc, etc. that
> encapsulate common usage patterns and provide more type safety.
>
> Examples:
>
> - result = (IndexBuildResult *) palloc(sizeof(IndexBuildResult));
> + result = palloc_obj(IndexBuildResult);
>
> - collector->tuples = (IndexTuple *) palloc(sizeof(IndexTuple) *
> collector->lentuples);
> + collector->tuples = palloc_array(IndexTuple, collector->lentuples);
>
> One common point is that the new interfaces all have a return type that
> automatically matches what they are allocating, so you don't need any
> casts nor have to manually make sure the size matches the expected
> result. Besides the additional safety, the notation is also more
> compact, as you can see above.
>
> Inspired by the talloc library.
>
> The interesting changes are in fe_memutils.h and palloc.h. The rest of
> the patch is just randomly sprinkled examples to test/validate the new
> additions.
It seems interesting. Are we always type-casting explicitly the output
of palloc/palloc0? Does this mean the compiler takes care of
type-casting the returned void * to the target type?
I see lots of instances where there's no explicit type-casting to the
target variable type -
retval = palloc(sizeof(GISTENTRY));
Interval *p = palloc(sizeof(Interval));
macaddr *v = palloc0(sizeof(macaddr)); and so on.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2022-05-17 12:09:55 | Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine |
Previous Message | Mahendra Singh Thalor | 2022-05-17 11:44:23 | Re: Collecting statistics about contents of JSONB columns |