From: | Erika Knihti-Van Driessche <erika(dot)knihti(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Security patch older releases |
Date: | 2019-08-29 12:49:02 |
Message-ID: | CALgXhV9=HYo7JNAc-xk2oG2JWCzN4PMWz=EOXeFF13vAtHJDbQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I was a bit afraid of this.. And of course I want all the latest security
improvements, it's not about that.. it was about the other release
sandbox. Maybe they can then first patch their sandbox, issue solved ;-)
Thanks for all the replies & have a nice end of week!
Erika
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:25, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:05 PM Erika Knihti-Van Driessche
> <erika(dot)knihti(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > So, I have postgres 9.6.9 and customer wants it to be updated to 9.6.11,
> because that is their current testing "sandbox" version, which was not
> installed by me and is also another linux distro.
>
> Binary packages are always at the latest minor version, so you have to
> either force your client to test against latest version or install it
> by your own downloading the tarball or using tools like pgenv and
> alike.
>
> Luca
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Day, David | 2019-08-29 13:04:25 | RE: Rename a column if not already renamed.? |
Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2019-08-29 12:24:39 | Re: Security patch older releases |