From: | Daulat <daulat(dot)dba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More than one Cluster on single server (single instance) |
Date: | 2022-07-21 10:01:44 |
Message-ID: | CALfOM6KebnM8AMkCepMa6zFyUu3iLenTUegDLoxo-_f+j2ciiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have resolved this issue and it's working.
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 1:45 PM Daulat <daulat(dot)dba(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for your inputs.
>
> We are thinking about this approach to consolidate some small applications
> of individual clients and to perform administration (data/log/pgbackrest
> backups etc.) separately which is not possible on a single cluster.
>
> We have tried to create and start the cluster with different port 5433 on
> separate data directory but getting some errors.
>
> - I replaced the default port with 5433 in the postgresql.conf
> file.
>
> - We are not using Ubuntu , hence, I think we can’t use the
> pg_cluster
>
> ./initdb -D /opt/PostgreSQL-10/whr_data1_5433 -U postgres -W
>
> ./pg_ctl -D /opt/PostgreSQL-10/whr_data1_5433 -l
> /opt/PostgreSQL-10/whr_dlog/start.log start
>
>
>
> Error while creating Cluster:
>
> [postgres(at)ip-172-31-32-99 bin]$ cat /opt/PostgreSQL-10/whr_dlog/start.log
>
> 2022-07-18 13:11:14.404 UTC [13418] LOG: could not bind IPv4 address
> "127.0.0.1": Address already in use
>
> 2022-07-18 13:11:14.404 UTC [13418] HINT: Is another postmaster already
> running on port 5432? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.
>
> 2022-07-18 13:11:14.404 UTC [13418] WARNING: could not create listen
> socket for "localhost"
>
> 2022-07-18 13:11:14.404 UTC [13418] FATAL: could not create any TCP/IP
> sockets
>
> 2022-07-18 13:11:14.404 UTC [13418] LOG: database system is shut down
>
> [postgres(at)ip-172-31-32-99 bin]$
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 7:12 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/18/22 04:46, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> It would make things easier for you to use a single cluster, and as many
>> databases as you want in this cluster.
>>
>>
>> It would make *PITR* restoration *of a single database* (or small set of
>> databases) impossible (since such backups -- and therefore restores -- are
>> always binary "whole cluster").
>>
>> --
>> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Kalcher | 2022-07-21 11:15:43 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample() |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2022-07-21 08:41:30 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample() |