| From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql: Greatly speed up "\d tablename" when not using regexes |
| Date: | 2024-04-10 18:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | CALdSSPjcUmVLidTTb+CANyd2TEq0tkOCe=r+xYbuhpuOePKHag@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, 23:37 Jelte Fennema-Nio, <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 20:21, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Do we need to force Collaction here like in other branches?
> > if (PQserverVersion(conn) >= 120000)
> > appendPQExpBufferStr(buf, " COLLATE pg_catalog.default");
>
> According to the commit and codecomment that introduced the COLLATE,
> it was specifically added for correct regex matching (e.g. \w). So I
> don't think it's necessary, and I'm pretty sure adding it will cause
> the index scan not to be used anymore.
>
Ok, thanks for the clarification. If all of this is actually true, and
patch is really does speedup, maybe we need to state this in the comments?
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-04-10 18:54:46 | Re: broken JIT support on Fedora 40 |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-04-10 18:36:57 | Re: psql: Greatly speed up "\d tablename" when not using regexes |