From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: in BeginCopyTo make materialized view using COPY TO instead of COPY (query). |
Date: | 2025-04-01 14:14:31 |
Message-ID: | CALdSSPgxiAaMsJoEz9c9TvE2cuoOiuRD6YAa88kmop9+37FnDw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 15:52, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 15:49, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, 11:45 vignesh C, <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> One thing I noticed was that if the materialized view is not refreshed
> >> user will get stale data
> >>
> >> Should we document this?
> >
> > Does this patch alter thus behaviour? User will get stale data even on HEAD, why should we take a care within this thread?
>
> We are not changing the existing behavior. However, since copying data
> from large tables can take a significant amount of time, would it be
> helpful to add a cautionary note advising users to refresh the
> materialized view before running copy command to avoid stale data?
> This could prevent users from realizing the issue only after running
> the copy operation, which would then require them to run it again.
Yes, agree, +1 on that.
> If
> you think this is already obvious, then the note may not be necessary.
I don't think this is already obvious, but my objection is that we
should maybe discuss this as a separate issue (in a separate patch).
Looks like fixing this together with code commit is too much at once.
I prefer a one-commit-for-one-purpose style.
> Regards,
> Vignesh
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Jackson | 2025-04-01 14:19:31 | Re: Update LDAP Protocol in fe-connect.c to v3 |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-04-01 14:08:12 | Re: Make query cancellation keys longer |