Re: Best filesystem for a high load db

From: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best filesystem for a high load db
Date: 2014-12-01 14:38:57
Message-ID: CALd+dcfuy_jp=-1WTf01UYoFrBPCTAmiQAZixWQAFd7QwBZ0BQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Joseph Kregloh <jkregloh(at)sproutloud(dot)com>
wrote:

> One thing I am pushing to do is using SSDs for the ZIL and L2ARC. This
> would allow for a pretty nice boost in speed.
>

I use ZFS on freebsd as my large production server configuration as well. I
have SSDs for the L2ARC and that works *really* well. I do not use a ZIL at
all. Using the ZFS compression is a big win, along with all the other
management advantages you already outlined.

There is a minor speed penalty, but the other advantages far outweigh
those. That and throwing 256GB of RAM at the problem makes it more or less
go away.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vick Khera 2014-12-01 14:40:23 Re: Lock Management: Waiting on locks
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2014-12-01 14:32:52 Re: What is default password for user postgres