Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?

From: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?
Date: 2016-01-12 13:50:34
Message-ID: CALd+dcfnKXxZEk0ORPAUfrLHs3WwmxYg-sg=jD46GGiTzNH=1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com> wrote:
> All because somebody just *had* to personally insult someone else,
> repeatedly, and nobody thought that was a bad thing, and when the
> recipient finally objected, the objection was chalked up to him or her
> valuing his/her victimhood.

+1

I was thinking along the same lines when I saw JD's original list
containing that "victimhood" line. I think that one line pretty much
eviscerates the entire purpose of having the CoC.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Regina Obe 2016-01-12 14:07:08 Re: WIP: CoC
Previous Message Regina Obe 2016-01-12 13:42:16 Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?