| From: | Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Anudeep Gudipelli <Anudeep(dot)Gudipelli(at)alticeusa(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5 |
| Date: | 2018-05-06 15:31:38 |
| Message-ID: | CALd+dcexJPARvW+OKNbdBD4cfaRwRNujh5NvxRuvO3riNMfwnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 7:49 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If you want an opinion, opting for more than one release behind current on
> fear grounds is an ultra-conservative position - you might as well minimize
> the pain and go recent and keep it longer. At this point I'd be asking
> myself whether 9.6 or 10 is the better choice. Though with a third-party
> application that runs on top of it I'd probably limit myself to the highest
> release they purport to support.
>
>
Precisely why I suggest 9.6
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-05-06 20:54:01 | Re: User defined functions in Postgresql, troubles with the c code |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-05-06 11:01:21 | Re: what's the error meaning? on mast/slavery replication . |