| From: | Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: best config |
| Date: | 2013-02-07 19:11:38 |
| Message-ID: | CALd+dce-GSVT2zVYJhbBSpLLGxoqxQSauHt_Lj3jj+gxg-pgFw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Steven Schlansker <steven(at)likeness(dot)com>wrote:
> > ok. we thought in this crossed-replication config because one heavy
> query in one of the databases wouldnt affect the performance of the other.
>
> Both of your servers need to be powerful enough to handle the whole load,
> otherwise your replication setup will not continue to function acceptably
> when one of the servers is offline due to a crash or maintenance.
>
I agree here. Unless you all you want is to have your data, in which case
any old machine that has disk space can be your archived server.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavan Schneider | 2013-02-07 21:25:12 | Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-07 18:44:02 | Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1 |