From: | Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Leap second impact on postgreSQL on June 30 2015 |
Date: | 2015-02-24 13:35:44 |
Message-ID: | CALd+dcdghkBSUte8O=10LtVc0f-L8TFGvAd6incaSu0TcqeO8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Mitu Verma <mitu(dot)verma(at)ericsson(dot)com> wrote:
> What could be the possible impacts of leap second on June 30 2105 (which
> will make the one second longer time) at PostgreSQL database ?
>
>
As an experiment, try setting the time to the leap second and see if
postgres stores it as you expect. Ie, set your time to "June 30, 2015
23:59:60 UTC".
On 9.4.1 it is not looking like it knows that second exists.
postgres=> select version();
-[ RECORD 1
]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
version | PostgreSQL 9.4.1 on amd64-portbld-freebsd9.3, compiled by cc
(GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD], 64-bit
Time: 163.817 ms
postgres=> select 'June 30, 2015 23:59:59 UTC'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
------------------------
2015-06-30 19:59:59-04
(1 row)
Time: 22.110 ms
postgres=> select 'June 30, 2015 23:59:60 UTC'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
------------------------
2015-06-30 20:00:00-04
(1 row)
Time: 0.643 ms
postgres=> select 'July 1, 2015 00:00:00 UTC'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
------------------------
2015-06-30 20:00:00-04
(1 row)
Time: 0.731 ms
postgres=> set timezone='UTC';
SET
Time: 17.630 ms
postgres=> select 'July 1, 2015 00:00:00 UTC'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
------------------------
2015-07-01 00:00:00+00
(1 row)
Time: 0.661 ms
postgres=> select 'June 30, 2015 23:59:60 UTC'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
------------------------
2015-07-01 00:00:00+00
(1 row)
Time: 0.726 ms
postgres=> select 'June 30, 2015 23:59:59 UTC'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
------------------------
2015-06-30 23:59:59+00
(1 row)
Time: 0.698 ms
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergey Shchukin | 2015-02-24 13:42:06 | Issue with a hanging apply process on the replica db after vacuum works on primary |
Previous Message | Guillaume Drolet | 2015-02-24 13:06:22 | Re: Sequences not moved to new tablespace |