Quick Links

Re: GIN Indexes: Extensibility

From:	Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To:	pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: GIN Indexes: Extensibility
Date:	2016-07-27 14:44:22
Message-ID:	CALd+dccZmVsTEPrv23oF+Du3iAi9bZy97v8h=OeAfU-shD8EVg@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Anton Ananich <anton(dot)ananich(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In my situation this order is invalid. Obviously, year 2016 should go after
> 2014, like that:

I think you expect JSONB to sort differently than it does. I cannot
imagine what a "natural" ordering of arbitrary JSON objects is.

In response to

GIN Indexes: Extensibility at 2016-07-27 07:28:45 from Anton Ananich

Responses

Re: GIN Indexes: Extensibility at 2016-07-27 15:00:05 from Paul Jungwirth
Re: GIN Indexes: Extensibility at 2016-07-28 13:57:23 from Anton Ananich

Browse pgsql-general by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	thomas veymont	2016-07-27 14:52:38	Re: low perfomances migrating from 9.3 to 9.5
Previous Message	Scott Mead	2016-07-27 14:22:27	Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL