Re: Rackspace to RDS using DMS (Postgres 9.2)

From: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rackspace to RDS using DMS (Postgres 9.2)
Date: 2016-09-01 21:15:30
Message-ID: CALd+dccYKWmvaTFc9o-vHXA8SBQ=TNiu-JbTA++eKgBFoPwz1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mike Sofen <msofen(at)runbox(dot)com> wrote:
> $100k/ $620 = 161 months of operation before cost parity.

You ought to maybe compare what you can buy from an outfit like
Silicon Mechanics for ~$15k. I suspect you could get 16-core, 256GB
RAM, and several TB of disk. And then your parity would be much
shorter and you'd have higher performance.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dandl 2016-09-02 00:08:43 Re: UPDATE OR REPLACE?
Previous Message Patrick B 2016-09-01 21:15:02 Re: Rackspace to RDS using DMS (Postgres 9.2)