Re: Out of memory condition

From: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Out of memory condition
Date: 2014-12-11 18:42:09
Message-ID: CALd+dcc5ZCoGPo5JyMy5ys=N0kN5m12xGaz0kzktRo2okZp9Kw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> needed to hold relcache entries for all 23000 tables :-(. If so there
> may not be any easy way around it, except perhaps replicating subsets
> of the tables. Unless you can boost the memory available to the backend
>

I'd suggest this. Break up your replication into something like 50 sets of
500 tables each, then add one at a time to replication, merging it into the
main set. Something like this:

create & replicate set 1.
create & replicate set 2.
merge 2 into 1.
create & replicate set 3.
merge 3 into 1.

repeat until done. this can be scripted.

Given you got about 50% done before it failed, maybe even 4 sets of 6000
tables each may work out.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlos Henrique Reimer 2014-12-11 19:05:00 Re: Out of memory condition
Previous Message Carlos Henrique Reimer 2014-12-11 17:41:27 Re: Out of memory condition