From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: tsearch2, large data and indexes |
Date: | 2014-04-23 22:56:32 |
Message-ID: | CAL_0b1vo9ibxHG3MayGKNxiOJH3is3kav5E1x+eBQZv6QC4Wow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> wrote:
> Ok, I found out what is happening, quoting from the documentation:
>
> "GIN indexes are not lossy for standard queries, but their performance
> depends logarithmically on the number of unique words. (However, GIN
> indexes store only the words (lexemes) oftsvector values, and not
> their weight labels. Thus a table row recheck is needed when using a
> query that involves weights.)"
>
> My query doesn't have weights but the tsvector in the table has them -
> I take it this is what is meant by "involves weights."
>
> So... there's really no way for tsearch2 to produce results based on
> the index alone, without recheck? This is... limiting.
My guess is that you could use strip() function [1] to get rid of
weights in your table or, that would probably be better, in your index
only by using expressions in it and in the query, eg.
...USING gin (strip(fts_data))
and
... WHERE strip(fts_data) @@ q
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/textsearch-features.html
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-04-24 11:34:22 | Re: tsearch2, large data and indexes |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-04-23 18:29:00 | Re: HFS+ pg_test_fsync performance |