| From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | markus(dot)holmberg(at)codento(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FATAL: index contains unexpected zero page at block |
| Date: | 2013-12-26 22:25:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAL_0b1uzzEXZx+31BFBRGAC1=aBAM0vefagQEL7x8QD97oFSzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:48 AM, <markus(dot)holmberg(at)codento(dot)com> wrote:
> WARNING: page 1 of relation base/37706/11821 is uninitialized
> CONTEXT: xlog redo vacuum: rel 1663/37706/11821; blk 2, lastBlockVacuumed
> 0
> PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages
> CONTEXT: xlog redo vacuum: rel 1663/37706/11821; blk 2, lastBlockVacuumed
> 0
>
> What could cause "index contains unexpected zero page at block 0" errors as
> shown above on a hot standby?
I think it might be related to the issue [1]. It looks like I managed
to fix it by upgrading to the last minor version (that contains some
critical bug fixes [2] [3]) and by performing reindex after it.
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAL_0b1s4QCkFy_55kk_8XWcJPs7wsgVWf8vn4=jXe6V4R7Hxmg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
[2] http://www.databasesoup.com/2013/12/why-you-need-to-apply-todays-update.html
[3] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-9-3-2.html
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2013-12-26 23:11:10 | postgresql-common breaks logrotate |
| Previous Message | Raphael Araújo e Silva | 2013-12-26 21:07:33 | pgModeler the new Open source data modeling for PostgreSQL |