| From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Anibal David Acosta <aa(at)devshock(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
| Date: | 2011-11-14 10:08:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAL_0b1tuxi9YVhGKsNUSTZCUBXgOmppan7w+KkRZARbQ=u4P5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 14 November 2011 12:58, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
> Because they bypass the transaction-log (WAL), hence unlogged.
> There's no way to know whether there were partial updates applied when the
> system restarts.
I probably did not understand the "truncate" meaning correct. It
truncates all the records of the table or several recent records only?
>
> --
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
>
--
Sergey Konoplev
Blog: http://gray-hemp.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://ru.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
JID/GTalk: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com Skype: gray-hemp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2011-11-14 10:17:58 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Alexandru | 2011-11-14 10:00:47 | What's the state of postgresql on ext4 now? |