| From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Granthana Biswas <granthana(at)zedo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL General Discussion Forum <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dead rows not getting removed during vacuum |
| Date: | 2014-03-21 15:21:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAL_0b1tPrAQiyVxcXhKukhZxH9-sffwAcnXCm8ECbtHrepOhCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Granthana Biswas <granthana(at)zedo(dot)com> wrote:
> We don't have two-phase commit prepared transactions. During vacuum, along with this problem we are also facing streaming replication issue. Hundreds of xlogs are in ready state in pg_xlog/archive_status. Those are being copied manually after vacuum otherwise rsync happens very slowly and replication lag keeps increasing.
Okay, I see. Then next questions are:
What postgres version is it?
What max_standby_archive_delay and max_standby_streaming_delay are set to?
Are there any long running activity or idling in transaction backends
on your slaves?
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glenn Pierce | 2014-03-21 15:55:02 | Passing array of range literals |
| Previous Message | Ashmita Jain | 2014-03-21 10:16:57 | COPY error with null date |