Re: Postgres replication question :- One master 2 slaves 9.0.10

From: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: akp geek <akpgeek(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres replication question :- One master 2 slaves 9.0.10
Date: 2013-10-02 03:48:10
Message-ID: CAL_0b1tKE1xJySd0b00+dOgVmS==kU1Hy9p79NonLV6FdFyZHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> you don't need to use streaming replication for a hot standby, it
> works perfectly well even if you replay everything from archive and
> never do streaming.

Right, I mixed up a with the terms a bit.

> but it would be a good idea to set hot_standby_feedback to on and
> max_standby_archive_delay to something larger than 30s

Doesn't replica need a connection to master for hot_standby_feedback?

--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA

http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey Konoplev 2013-10-02 03:51:56 Re: Postgres replication question :- One master 2 slaves 9.0.10
Previous Message Chris Travers 2013-10-02 03:09:50 Re: Largest PG database known to man!