| From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | rektide <rektide(at)voodoowarez(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on server, asynchronous processing |
| Date: | 2012-12-11 20:58:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAL_0b1tH4Gu2tdy6Jj4VmBcF3RDQqg2yEG1BE2bXm_x+f_5thA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, rektide <rektide(at)voodoowarez(dot)com> wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions for decoupling work done on a server, for breaking up a task
> into multiple asychronous pieces? I believe I've described 1. a viable if ugly means of
> doing so, and 2. limitations in the primary asynchronous toolsuite of Postgres, and am
> looking for ways to make more progress.
Use PgQ (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGQ_Tutorial) for this
purpose. It is simple to implement solution and it will allow you to
preserve your queries between server restarts.
--
Sergey Konoplev
Database and Software Architect
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
Phones:
USA +1 415 867 9984
Russia, Moscow +7 901 903 0499
Russia, Krasnodar +7 988 888 1979
Skype: gray-hemp
Jabber: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mihai Popa | 2012-12-11 21:03:27 | Re: large database |
| Previous Message | Ben Chobot | 2012-12-11 20:27:20 | Re: large database |