Re: Expensive log_line_prefix ?

From: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sahagian, David" <david(dot)sahagian(at)emc(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expensive log_line_prefix ?
Date: 2012-10-11 21:57:24
Message-ID: CAL_0b1t5CdztCz-0cMa4oBz9QqdUHc-fKtYc+av8_GzimgnK1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Sahagian, David
<david(dot)sahagian(at)emc(dot)com> wrote:
> Are there any "extra" costs to logging all this cool stuff ?
>
> log_line_prefix = '%m %a %u %p %c %m %v %x'

The formatting cost only but it is so insignificant that does not
worth bothering with it.

--
Sergey Konoplev

a database and software architect
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp

Jabber: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com Skype: gray-hemp Phone: +14158679984

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2012-10-11 22:06:38 Re: Expensive log_line_prefix ?
Previous Message Sergey Konoplev 2012-10-11 21:46:03 Re: non-integer constant in ORDER BY: why exactly, and documentation?