From: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Максим Панченко <Panchenko(at)gw(dot)tander(dot)ru>, Толстенко Илья <tolstenko_iv(at)gw(dot)tander(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Completely broken replica after PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages |
Date: | 2013-03-29 21:53:26 |
Message-ID: | CAL_0b1sJHOwmSDRkP8a8QFKVDTrvEkxN_LfD-GaBSPS4LC2v_w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I have to admit, I find it a bit confusing that so many people report a
> bug and then immediately destroy all evidence of the bug. Just seems to
> a happen a bit too frequently.
You see, businesses usually need it up ASAP again. Sorry, I must have
note down the output of pg_controldata straight after it got broken, I
just have not came up to it.
> Thats not a pg_controldata output from the broken replica though, or is
> it? I guess its from a new standby?
That was the output from the standby that was rsync-ed on top of the
broken one. I thought you might find something useful in it.
Can I test your guess some other way? And what was the guess?
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
Database and Software Consultant
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
Phone: USA +1 (415) 867-9984, Russia +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
Skype: gray-hemp
Jabber: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | stiening | 2013-03-30 14:01:27 | BUG #8013: Memory leak |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-03-29 21:38:34 | Re: Completely broken replica after PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages |