Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?

From: Sergey Konoplev <sergey(dot)konoplev(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com>
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Date: 2012-07-16 18:35:49
Message-ID: CAL_0b1sAQwOXWPOFuk8VJPqCfLYXGJenWM4QxdciYxW6uSmfFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As I understand the docs for rsync, it will use both mod time and file size
>> if told not to do checksums.

I wonder if it is correct in general to use mtime and size to perform
these checks from the point of view of PostgreSQL.

If it works with the current version then is there a guaranty that it
will work with the future versions?

>
> Oh, so it does, I misread. Thanks! Time+size it is.
>
> ChrisA
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

--
Sergey Konoplev

a database architect, software developer at PostgreSQL-Consulting.com
http://www.postgresql-consulting.com

Jabber: gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com Skype: gray-hemp Phone: +79160686204

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Nolan 2012-07-16 18:53:01 Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Previous Message David Johnston 2012-07-16 18:08:44 Re: Can't figure out how to use now() in default for tsrange column (PG 9.2)