Re: BDR global sequences in two machine failover

From: Giovanni Maruzzelli <gmaruzz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BDR global sequences in two machine failover
Date: 2015-09-08 12:59:19
Message-ID: CALXCt0oAE7nJ8KGrF9=3Mf8yBAw_iwnZgx1W0fVUBAYtKS5VFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks again and more Craig

-giovanni

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 7 September 2015 at 20:56, Giovanni Maruzzelli <gmaruzz(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > If I do not use global sequences, and I use uuid as primary keys, would
> BDR
> > be a correct choice?
>
> For something like a VoIP service where eventual consistency is
> usually OK and geographic redundancy with latency tolerance and
> partition tolerance is needed, yes, it could make a lot of sense.
>
> You could use UUID keys or use normal sequences with different offsets
> on the nodes. UUID will probably be easier to manage.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>

--
Sincerely,

Giovanni Maruzzelli
Cell : +39-347-2665618

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melvin Davidson 2015-09-08 13:44:01 Re: view
Previous Message Ray Stell 2015-09-08 12:34:59 Re: bdr admin role