From: | Adam S <adam(dot)sah(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de, Steve Chavez <steve(at)supabase(dot)io>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql: add \create_function command |
Date: | 2024-01-26 20:23:43 |
Message-ID: | CALWCfdLJESOMWoA1-3+871p2if28SavXgfrav+gLh=xGcL0-Hw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
idea: what about custom functions for (each) IDE, which calls psql -c
"CREATE FUNCTION ..." when the user saves the file? (it would easy to
prototype for emacs...)
(obviously, this isn't a core feature...)
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 3:19 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> pá 26. 1. 2024 v 21:17 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > I don't know, maybe I have a problem with the described use case. I
>> cannot
>> > imagine holding the body and head of PL routines in different places
>> and I
>> > don't understand the necessity to join it.
>>
>> It seems a little weird to me too, and I would vote against accepting
>> \create_function as described because I think too few people would
>> want to use it. However, the idea of an easy way to pull in a file
>> and convert it to a SQL literal seems like it has many applications.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Pavel
>
>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-01-26 20:34:53 | Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-01-26 20:18:47 | Re: psql: add \create_function command |