| From: | Arthur Nascimento <tureba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields |
| Date: | 2020-04-21 18:45:47 |
| Message-ID: | CALVFHFYnXzkdLwCsqOw5zb9mD0=irQpO6U+D1qveu8WFo2A_Hg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Bruce,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 15:27, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> > formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats. The ones on host[no]gssenc
> > were added to the IP-address/IP-mask section, but not to the address
> > section. I believe the intention was to have 11 lines there, with a
> > corresponding count at the top.
...
> I agree with your suggestions. I also noticed that pg_hba.conf is
> missing gssapi entries too, so I added them to the attached patch. too.
I thought the list would jump to 11 lines there, meaning 1 local plus
5 on address plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.
As it stands now with 9 lines, it's 1 local plus 3 on address (it's
missing the two on host[no]gssenc) plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.
Tureba - Arthur Nascimento
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-04-21 19:08:22 | Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-04-21 18:27:36 | Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields |