Quick Links

Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields

From:	Arthur Nascimento <tureba(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc:	pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date:	2020-04-21 19:30:45
Message-ID:	CALVFHFY97uidEF8ymtoc7Ooqkt9Dh1RoeOrpW0a8jDq5EeQdgw@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-bugs

Hi Bruce,

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:08, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Ah, I see. Updated patch attached.

That looks perfect. Thank you!

Tureba - Arthur Nascimento

In response to

Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields at 2020-04-21 19:08:22 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields at 2020-04-21 19:43:19 from Arthur Nascimento

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Arthur Nascimento	2020-04-21 19:43:19	Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Previous Message	Bruce Momjian	2020-04-21 19:08:22	Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields