| From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Ken Kato <katouknl(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do? |
| Date: | 2022-04-01 12:53:44 |
| Message-ID: | CALT9ZEHOrsAic+LVb-C5vN_NvUiKF9D=Wh5__=B6Q5wVNx3tYw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> A different and more important issue (IMO) is that the xlog record
>
header currently only supports 32-bit xids -- long-running
> transactions can reasonably see a xid4 wraparound in their lifetime.
You're completely right. This is a first of making xid's 64-bit proposed
[1] i.e, making SLRU 64-bit [2]
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-01 12:58:27 | Re: Correct docs re: rewriting indexes when table rewrite is skipped |
| Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2022-04-01 12:43:03 | Re: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do? |