Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Date: 2023-11-28 09:00:07
Message-ID: CALT9ZEGSbNjpmSVqhjgnpYLLoNy9dq8RgxWhtP7n0Y+CmhTjeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, hackers!

> You're designing new APIs, days before the feature freeze.
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 06:54, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 01:25:46AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > Pavel, thank you for you review, revisions and rebase.
> > We'll reconsider this once v17 is branched.

I've looked through patches v16 once more and think they're good
enough, and previous issues are all addressed. I see that there is
nothing that blocks it from being committed except the last iteration
was days before v16 feature freeze.

Recently in another thread [1] Alexander posted a new version of
patches v16 (as 0001 and 0002) In 0001 only indenation, comments, and
commit messages changed from v16 in this thread. In 0002 new test
eval-plan-qual-2 was integrated into the existing eval-plan-qual test.
For maintaining the most recent versions in this thread I'm attaching
them under v17. I suppose that we can commit these patches to v17 if
there are no objections or additional reviews.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com

Kind regards,
Pavel Borisov

Attachment Content-Type Size
v17-0002-Add-EvalPlanQual-delete-returning-isolation-test-v1.patch application/octet-stream 3.0 KB
v17-0001-Allow-locking-updated-tuples-in-tuple_update-and--v1.patch application/octet-stream 61.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-11-28 09:13:24 Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-11-28 08:53:44 Re: [Proposal] global sequence implemented by snowflake ID