From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem with moderation of messages with patched attached. |
Date: | 2022-03-03 13:47:43 |
Message-ID: | CALT9ZEGCd5axJDbw=K3G2K2auCoKEVcin3CfK-XEU6VxGe352g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
>>> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
>>>
>> Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's not so convenient. Lead to
>> answers before the questions in the thread [1], seems weird.
>>
>
> Then someone will complain if their patch is 2.1MB! How often are messages
> legitimately over 1MB anyway, even with a patch? I don't usually moderate
> -hackers, so I don't know if this is a common thing or not.
>
Hi, Dave!
Authors in the mentioned thread [1] bump into this issue while posting all
11 versions of a patchset. It is little bit more than 1MB. We can try to
use .gz and if this doesn't work we report it again.
I'll ping a message across to the sysadmin team anyway; I can't just change
> that setting without buy-in from the rest of the team.
>
Thanks! Maybe this will solve the issue.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frédéric Yhuel | 2022-03-03 14:12:46 | Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks? |
Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-03-03 13:47:40 | Re: Problem with moderation of messages with patched attached. |