From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Evgeny Voropaev <evorop(dot)wiki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs |
Date: | 2024-12-10 13:43:14 |
Message-ID: | CALT9ZEG9C6uXXrs+BOrQ4br4BW2x0Yi8qXxBg2m2vuj=Va8ozQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Wenhui!
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 17:32, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi aleksander
> Didn't you mark this patch as rejected last time? Do we still need to
> continue this path?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:16 PM Evgeny Voropaev <evorop(dot)wiki(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi hackers!
>>
>> Upgraded the "Int64 GUC" patch in order to conform to f3f06b13308e3
>> updates. Rebased and tested upon the current master (3f9b9621766). The
>> patch is still needed to be up to date as a part of the xid64 solution.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Evgeny Voropaev,
>> TantorLabs, LLC.
>> <evorop(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> <evgeny(dot)voropaev(at)tantorlabs(dot)ru>
>
>
I see Aleksander worked on this patch (with many other hackers) and marked
it as rejected. And now Evgeniy, a new developer wants to continue and
rebase this patch and also the patches in another 64-xid thread
disregarding the fact that the patch is rejected. It's not a crime. It's
rejected, true.
Regards,
Pavel Borisov
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-12-10 13:53:50 | Re: Fix bank selection logic in SLRU |
Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2024-12-10 13:32:27 | Re: Define STATS_MIN_ROWS for minimum rows of stats in ANALYZE |