Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Evgeny Voropaev <evorop(dot)wiki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs
Date: 2024-12-10 13:43:14
Message-ID: CALT9ZEG9C6uXXrs+BOrQ4br4BW2x0Yi8qXxBg2m2vuj=Va8ozQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Wenhui!

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 17:32, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi aleksander
> Didn't you mark this patch as rejected last time? Do we still need to
> continue this path?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:16 PM Evgeny Voropaev <evorop(dot)wiki(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi hackers!
>>
>> Upgraded the "Int64 GUC" patch in order to conform to f3f06b13308e3
>> updates. Rebased and tested upon the current master (3f9b9621766). The
>> patch is still needed to be up to date as a part of the xid64 solution.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Evgeny Voropaev,
>> TantorLabs, LLC.
>> <evorop(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> <evgeny(dot)voropaev(at)tantorlabs(dot)ru>
>
>
I see Aleksander worked on this patch (with many other hackers) and marked
it as rejected. And now Evgeniy, a new developer wants to continue and
rebase this patch and also the patches in another 64-xid thread
disregarding the fact that the patch is rejected. It's not a crime. It's
rejected, true.

Regards,
Pavel Borisov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-12-10 13:53:50 Re: Fix bank selection logic in SLRU
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2024-12-10 13:32:27 Re: Define STATS_MIN_ROWS for minimum rows of stats in ANALYZE