| From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Evgeny Voropaev <evorop(dot)wiki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs |
| Date: | 2024-12-10 15:22:29 |
| Message-ID: | CALT9ZEEAh52FLzMWAWFvtnvZECaH+idd8Mkh9sdsE5XD7NYZyQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 19:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I see Aleksander worked on this patch (with many other hackers) and
> marked
> > it as rejected. And now Evgeniy, a new developer wants to continue and
> > rebase this patch and also the patches in another 64-xid thread
> > disregarding the fact that the patch is rejected. It's not a crime. It's
> > rejected, true.
>
> No, but it's a waste of time. Just rebasing the patch does nothing to
> counter the arguments that made us reject it before.
>
Tom, I agree! Just wrote this because of probable confusion of names by
Wenhui above.
Regards,
Pavel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-12-10 15:25:12 | Re: Support for unsigned integer types |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-12-10 15:13:37 | Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs |