From: | Dev Kumkar <devdas(dot)kumkar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Grouping Sets |
Date: | 2013-07-05 03:45:09 |
Message-ID: | CALSLE1NoE37d5-848w6j61SK25uD33_+eD7KYpT4cSfD25+kPQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Dev Kumkar <devdas(dot)kumkar(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Ok, no problem. Will await for any other pointers regarding any related
> > patch here.
> >
> > Currently using UNION to archive similar results but looking if anything
> is
> > already done here.
> >
> > Looks like GROUPING SET was in the TODO list long back.
> >
> http://grokbase.com/t/postgresql/pgsql-general/06aaa4g7cq/cube-rollup-grouping-sets
> >
> > Am I missing anything here?
> >
> > Regards...
>
> Me and RhodiumToad discussed the idea recently, after David Fetter
> suggested that we work on it. We may start work on it soon, haven't
> thought in detail yet though.
Ok, 9.3 feature wise looks all done.
So I believe it will be in any 9.3 + release?
Till then will continue UNION approach as looks like it gives the necessary
functionality. Any loopholes here friends?
Regards...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Hale Boyes | 2013-07-05 04:28:18 | [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new GUC, max_worker_processes, limiting number of bgworkers. |
Previous Message | Arulappan, Arul Shaji | 2013-07-05 02:11:25 | Proposal - Support for National Characters functionality |