From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit |
Date: | 2021-01-17 18:02:15 |
Message-ID: | CALNJ-vTHJBFBVnxJ2soHhAg6UrCAD9RgMF9RF6yj5AhTuJM-mg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
This patch introduces new function postgres_fdw_disconnect() when
called with a foreign server name discards the associated
connections with the server name.
I think the following would read better:
This patch introduces *a* new function postgres_fdw_disconnect(). When
called with a foreign server name, it discards the associated
connections with the server.
Please note the removal of the 'name' at the end - connection is with
server, not server name.
+ if (is_in_use)
+ ereport(WARNING,
+ (errmsg("cannot close the connection because it is
still in use")));
It would be better to include servername in the message.
+ ereport(WARNING,
+ (errmsg("cannot close all connections because some
of them are still in use")));
I think showing the number of active connections would be more informative.
This can be achieved by changing active_conn_exists from bool to int (named
active_conns, e.g.):
+ if (entry->conn && !active_conn_exists)
+ active_conn_exists = true;
Instead of setting the bool value, active_conns can be incremented.
Cheers
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:39 PM Bharath Rupireddy <
bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:36 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > Please consider the v9 patch set for further review.
> > >
> > > Thanks for updating the patch! I reviewed only 0001 patch.
>
> I addressed the review comments and attached v10 patch set. Please
> consider it for further review.
>
>
> With Regards,
> Bharath Rupireddy.
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2021-01-17 18:11:22 | Re: cgit view availabel |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2021-01-17 17:58:02 | Re: cgit view availabel |