| From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Andrey V(dot) Lepikhov" <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage | 
| Date: | 2022-04-10 13:46:25 | 
| Message-ID: | CALNJ-vRF1fw9dh-2sZW9bETqwcttOMw4ptLp6sOrzVUSw=Ycvw@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 3:42 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 1:58 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 9:43 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > This patch seems to be causing the planner to crash.
> > > Here's a query reduced from sqlsmith.
> > >
> > > | explain SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.constraint_column_usage
> WHERE 1 <= pg_trigger_depth();
> > >
> > > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >
> > Reproduced.  Will look into this.
>
> I think the cause of this is that mark_async_capable_plan() failed to
> take into account that when the given path is a SubqueryScanPath or
> ForeignPath, the given corresponding plan might include a gating
> Result node that evaluates pseudoconstant quals.  My oversight.  :-(
> Attached is a patch for fixing that.  I think v14 has the same issue,
> so I think we need backpatching.
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita
>
Hi,
Looking at the second hunk of the patch:
                FdwRoutine *fdwroutine = path->parent->fdwroutine;
...
+               if (IsA(plan, Result))
+                   return false;
It seems the check of whether plan is a Result node can be lifted ahead of
the switch statement (i.e. to the beginning of mark_async_capable_plan).
This way, we don't have to check for every case in the switch statement.
Cheers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-04-10 16:43:30 | Re: Can we automatically add elapsed times to tap test log? | 
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-04-10 13:23:16 | Re: Can we automatically add elapsed times to tap test log? |