Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business

From: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business
Date: 2021-09-18 17:59:38
Message-ID: CALNJ-vQbxBk1YkcNdhZPS9Cqu-sinYaLGB77_2O-rpFkc7+opg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:06 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
> 5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]. While updating the v14 release notes,
> I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
> have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.
>
> I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
> in 14beta3. Thoughts?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ%3DuWWWfQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
> Hi,
+1 to backporting.

Thanks

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2021-09-18 18:58:36 Re: postgres.h included from relcache.h - but removing it breaks pg_upgrade
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-18 17:37:19 Re: Release 14 Schedule