From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business |
Date: | 2021-09-18 17:59:38 |
Message-ID: | CALNJ-vQbxBk1YkcNdhZPS9Cqu-sinYaLGB77_2O-rpFkc7+opg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:06 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
> 5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]. While updating the v14 release notes,
> I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
> have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.
>
> I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
> in 14beta3. Thoughts?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ%3DuWWWfQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
> Hi,
+1 to backporting.
Thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2021-09-18 18:58:36 | Re: postgres.h included from relcache.h - but removing it breaks pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-09-18 17:37:19 | Re: Release 14 Schedule |